Gay marriage. Why???
Does it seem weird to you why is this question asked?
And what is the aim from it.?
The answer will be because when you put that question it will lead to one answer. It is not to give a forbidden rights. Because simply all rights were already given before gay marriage. you may ask how is that. So let's see:...
1) First of all doesn't the law give every person in any democratic country his own freedom to does whatever he wants to does or has any kind of relationships. And no one has the right to interfere in his personal life as it is his own. Then it puts the question. Then what will gay marriage add to that??? Or gay marriage. why ??? As title.
2) Second let's assume that they want a commitment between each other. they could of done a contract . To share all what they have between each other and to give Inheritance to the second one in case of death . All were able to be done through simple laws. Then still the question goes on and more deep now. Gay marriage .Why???
As we see now it won't give anything new or forbidden. they had it all. They are free to do it. they are free to commitment to each other . And free to decide what happens if one decided to leave the other. All that they had. Then why making such a law????
Now still only to give the answer on that question that was found. The only thing that wasn't really allowed before that law. Which this article consider it a disaster. Which is the right to adopt children?.
And from that point why will it be a disaster and had no relation with different cultures or countries but wherever it is. It will always represent the same ((( A disaster))).
1) First of all . The principle of the right of freedom in any free country is built on that your own right of freedom can go as far as you like as long as it does not cross over the right of freedom of another person. Or by another way your right stops when others right starts. And in this particular case The right of gay couples in having children crosses over the right of the children itself. Because children have the right To have a normal raise up in a normal family in a normal way. and that is a legal and normal right. And by gay marriage this right has been violated.
2) It will represent a collapse in the mind of the child as the normal ideal model he will be seeing while growing up will be gay. And from another hand the normal ideal or normal marriage will only be an exception to him. Which will result a distortion inside the child. And for that I give an example If even a child in a normal traditional family which had problem matters with sex. like refusing it. Or violence related with it. Doesn't that leave an effect on the coming life of the child. And on that example you can measure. Also raising up in gay family will leave an effect on the child.
3) If anyone had that idea which someone shared with me on a social media site. Which says that children are just orphans and that adoption by these couples may provide them better life. Then the answer will be violating your right in being normal and effecting it. Is the biggest damage can be done. like the example of the slave who lives in the palace of his master and eat good food and even has pleasure. would that make it up for his lost freedom no matter how much happy he is?. Even if he became unfeeling of his lost freedom. Would that makes it better for him or worse. That his freedom has been taken from him until he turned to be unfeeling of it. And the biggest example for that is Afghanistan. which in it terrorists buy children from their families and turn them into sex boys. and when this boy grows up he became unfeeling of what happened to him and was convinced by them that this is ok. and he was enjoying it as what came in a report of one of the news channels over that issue. He became happy with rape happened to him when he was a kid. What can make it up for him. absolutely nothing in the world. (he lost his feelings and his mind was distorted).
4) In all cultures and all countries this should be the same. That gay is not a normal thing. It is a normal natural error. it is there and exists but it is not a normal thing. And it is divided into two types.
First type is the genetic error ( which is similar to disability or people born disable) which can produce mixed sex organs or hormones error. And all these problems are identified medically as errors or as a not normal behavior inside the human body and there are ways to fix that. through surgery or treatment drugs.
Second type which does not has any kind of these genetic errors And in this case it will be a choice built on lust which the person can prevent and control depending on his will. And it is the same way as when a normal person desires a girl or a girl desires a boy. Or even loving him or her more than just desire and sex .And always become liking to be with him or her. But in many cases you do not get what you desired and life still goes on. And there is the weak that won't be able to leave his love. And the strong which can go on in life. means in the second case it is a lust or desire and a choice and a will.
But there is something To be said: when saying that it is not normal that does not mean that normal people are better because actually they really can be better in this side but worse at other sides. Liar or a killer or a thief or adultery. Means it is not for condemn but just saying things as they are. The same as the person who was born without legs or blind....etc.
he has been born with a lost part which is not normal. But it can be identified as a natural normal error. No blame goes on him in case born with it.
--- also in religion side---. You need to differentiate between the two cases . As in case of born with hormones error Or with mixed sexual organ. This person needs special care. And medical help. The same as the person that was born disabled. Without legs or hands. But in the second case which having no errors but just a desire. Then it is a sin. and he needs to follow his religion teachings if he wishes to stay in it. He needs to strength his will. like any person committing a sin he needs to stop it.
And still the most important thing to say at the end that gay marriage is only for adopting children . Which means it represents a violation to children rights and all those who supported that law helped on that violation in any country in the world. And it becomes more bad when this country is considered a country that cares for the rights and freedom. And most of all children rights.
That's why there must be a big no for gay marriage. What is right is right. And what is wrong is wrong.
Does it seem weird to you why is this question asked?
And what is the aim from it.?
The answer will be because when you put that question it will lead to one answer. It is not to give a forbidden rights. Because simply all rights were already given before gay marriage. you may ask how is that. So let's see:...
1) First of all doesn't the law give every person in any democratic country his own freedom to does whatever he wants to does or has any kind of relationships. And no one has the right to interfere in his personal life as it is his own. Then it puts the question. Then what will gay marriage add to that??? Or gay marriage. why ??? As title.
2) Second let's assume that they want a commitment between each other. they could of done a contract . To share all what they have between each other and to give Inheritance to the second one in case of death . All were able to be done through simple laws. Then still the question goes on and more deep now. Gay marriage .Why???
As we see now it won't give anything new or forbidden. they had it all. They are free to do it. they are free to commitment to each other . And free to decide what happens if one decided to leave the other. All that they had. Then why making such a law????
Now still only to give the answer on that question that was found. The only thing that wasn't really allowed before that law. Which this article consider it a disaster. Which is the right to adopt children?.
And from that point why will it be a disaster and had no relation with different cultures or countries but wherever it is. It will always represent the same ((( A disaster))).
1) First of all . The principle of the right of freedom in any free country is built on that your own right of freedom can go as far as you like as long as it does not cross over the right of freedom of another person. Or by another way your right stops when others right starts. And in this particular case The right of gay couples in having children crosses over the right of the children itself. Because children have the right To have a normal raise up in a normal family in a normal way. and that is a legal and normal right. And by gay marriage this right has been violated.
2) It will represent a collapse in the mind of the child as the normal ideal model he will be seeing while growing up will be gay. And from another hand the normal ideal or normal marriage will only be an exception to him. Which will result a distortion inside the child. And for that I give an example If even a child in a normal traditional family which had problem matters with sex. like refusing it. Or violence related with it. Doesn't that leave an effect on the coming life of the child. And on that example you can measure. Also raising up in gay family will leave an effect on the child.
3) If anyone had that idea which someone shared with me on a social media site. Which says that children are just orphans and that adoption by these couples may provide them better life. Then the answer will be violating your right in being normal and effecting it. Is the biggest damage can be done. like the example of the slave who lives in the palace of his master and eat good food and even has pleasure. would that make it up for his lost freedom no matter how much happy he is?. Even if he became unfeeling of his lost freedom. Would that makes it better for him or worse. That his freedom has been taken from him until he turned to be unfeeling of it. And the biggest example for that is Afghanistan. which in it terrorists buy children from their families and turn them into sex boys. and when this boy grows up he became unfeeling of what happened to him and was convinced by them that this is ok. and he was enjoying it as what came in a report of one of the news channels over that issue. He became happy with rape happened to him when he was a kid. What can make it up for him. absolutely nothing in the world. (he lost his feelings and his mind was distorted).
4) In all cultures and all countries this should be the same. That gay is not a normal thing. It is a normal natural error. it is there and exists but it is not a normal thing. And it is divided into two types.
First type is the genetic error ( which is similar to disability or people born disable) which can produce mixed sex organs or hormones error. And all these problems are identified medically as errors or as a not normal behavior inside the human body and there are ways to fix that. through surgery or treatment drugs.
Second type which does not has any kind of these genetic errors And in this case it will be a choice built on lust which the person can prevent and control depending on his will. And it is the same way as when a normal person desires a girl or a girl desires a boy. Or even loving him or her more than just desire and sex .And always become liking to be with him or her. But in many cases you do not get what you desired and life still goes on. And there is the weak that won't be able to leave his love. And the strong which can go on in life. means in the second case it is a lust or desire and a choice and a will.
But there is something To be said: when saying that it is not normal that does not mean that normal people are better because actually they really can be better in this side but worse at other sides. Liar or a killer or a thief or adultery. Means it is not for condemn but just saying things as they are. The same as the person who was born without legs or blind....etc.
he has been born with a lost part which is not normal. But it can be identified as a natural normal error. No blame goes on him in case born with it.
--- also in religion side---. You need to differentiate between the two cases . As in case of born with hormones error Or with mixed sexual organ. This person needs special care. And medical help. The same as the person that was born disabled. Without legs or hands. But in the second case which having no errors but just a desire. Then it is a sin. and he needs to follow his religion teachings if he wishes to stay in it. He needs to strength his will. like any person committing a sin he needs to stop it.
And still the most important thing to say at the end that gay marriage is only for adopting children . Which means it represents a violation to children rights and all those who supported that law helped on that violation in any country in the world. And it becomes more bad when this country is considered a country that cares for the rights and freedom. And most of all children rights.
That's why there must be a big no for gay marriage. What is right is right. And what is wrong is wrong.
